Go to ScienceDirect® Home Skip Main Navigation Links
 
Home
Browse
Search
My Settings
Alerts
Help
 Quick Search   Title, abstract, keywords   Author e.g.  j s smith
 Search tips (Opens new window)   Journal/book title   Volume   Issue   Page     Clear all fields    
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Article in Press, Corrected Proof - Note to users
Result list |  previous  < 1 of 169 >  next 

SummaryPlus Full Text + Links PDF (1249 K)   View thumbnail images | View full size images
Add to my quick links    Cited by    E-mail article    Save as citation alert    Export citation + link    Set up a citation RSS feed (Opens new window)   

doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2007.07.042    How to Cite or Link Using DOI (Opens New Window)  
Copyright © 2007 International Association for Hydrogen Energy Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Boron substituted carbon nanotubes—How appropriate are they for hydrogen storage?

M. Sankarana, B. Viswanathannext terma, Corresponding Author Contact Information, E-mail The Corresponding Author and S. Srinivasa Murthyb
aNational Centre for Catalysis Research, Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
bMechanical Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai 600 036, India
Received 21 June 2007;  accepted 9 July 2007.  Available online 18 September 2007.



Abstract

The storage of hydrogen in carbon nanotubes requires appropriate chemical activators in suitable geometry. In this study, the role of boron substitution in carbon nanotubes is demonstrated for activation and storage of hydrogen.

Keywords: Hydrogen activation; Density functional theory; Heteroatom; Boron containing carbon nanotubes; Hydrogen storage; Volumetric method



1. Introduction

All three components of the hydrogen economy, namely, production, storage and application of hydrogen have been posing challenges to the scientific community for the past several decades. Developing a safe and reliable hydrogen storage technology that meets performance and cost requirements is critical to use hydrogen as a fuel for both vehicular and stationary power generation. Storage of hydrogen is attempted in various approaches involving gas phase storage with compressed hydrogen gas tanks, liquid hydrogen tanks and in solid substrates like metal hydrides, carbon-based materials/high surface area sorbants such as metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) and chemical hydrogen storage using complex hydrides. Among the various options of hydrogen storage, only storage in solid state materials seems to be promising. The scientific community in its anxiety and enthusiasm has come up with remarkable but not reproducible results for hydrogen storage in solid state. The desirable storage capacity for viable commercial exploitation of hydrogen as energy source is 6.5 wt% as postulated by US-DOE. However, any figure up to 67 wt% has been claimed as possible storage capacity in solids especially in carbon-based materials [1], [2], [3] and [4]. This situation is critical demanding definite and exploratory solutions from practicing scientists. The essential questions that require immediate attention are:

(i) Are the carbon materials appropriate for solid state hydrogen storage?

(ii) If this is to be true, what types of materials or treatments for the existing carbon materials are suitable to achieve the desirable levels of hydrogen storage?

(iii) What are the stumbling blocks in achieving the desirable storage of hydrogen in solid state?

(iv) Where does the lacuna lie? Is it in the theoretical foundation of the postulate or is it in our inability to experimentally realize the desired levels of storage?

Against this background, the need for an activator for hydrogenation in carbon materials is realized, which should be easily hydridable than carbon and facilitate migration of the dissociated hydrogen to carbon surface. The pure carbon surface cannot activate hydrogen molecule, which is clear from the recent inelastic neutron scattering experiments which has shown that binding strength of hydrogen molecule is almost the same for all kinds of carbon materials and the magnitude of interaction is around 5 kJ/mol [5] and [6]. There must be strong interaction between the hydrogen and carbon surface (chemisorption) to give rise to high storage capacity. For chemisorption, the hydrogen molecule should be activated. When doping carbon nanomaterials with alkali metal (Na, K), transition metals (Fe) and alloys (TiAl0.1V0.04, Ti–6Al–4V and NiO–MgO), the storage mechanism is different, as the metals involved form hydrides and the metal hydride could not store more than its number of atomic combinations [7], [8], [9], [10] and [11]. The alternative may be heteroatoms like N, P, S and B. They seem to be promising as activators [12] and [13] by activating hydrogen molecule due to their hydriding property and the higher redox potential than carbon.

In this study the importance, gradation and the geometrical positions of boron substitution in carbon nanotubes (CNTs) for hydrogen activation were studied through density functional theory (DFT). In correlation to theoretical results, experiments were carried out to show the role of boron atoms for hydrogen activation. Pure CNTs and boron containing carbon nanotubes (BCNTs) were prepared by using various templates such as zeolite, clay and alumina membranes. The prepared pure and BCNTs have been characterized by XRD, Raman spectrum, IR, CP MAS NMR, TEM and high pressure hydrogen adsorption measurements. The variation of template and the carbon precursor causes differences in the morphology. The chemical environment of boron and its relevance towards hydrogen storage application is also examined in correlation to theoretical results.

2. Computational methods

For the theoretical calculations the model has been constructed with three arm chair type (4,4) CNTs, which form a 3.65 Å inter tubular space as shown in Fig. 1. The details about the model construction and methodology used are given in our earlier communication [14]. The substitution of boron atoms are carried out at the edge positions of the nanotube, which show the minimum potential energy for the cluster. Computations using DFT have been carried out on the optimized configuration obtained using universal force field (UFF 1.02) parameter [15]. Cerius2 software was used for the force field calculations and the single point energy calculations on the optimized configurations obtained from force field have been carried out using Gaussian 03 with Becke's three parameter hybrid function with LYP correlation function (B3LYP) and 6-31G (p,d) as basis set [16], [17] and [18]. The total energy, H–H bond distance as well as the dissociation energy of hydrogen was obtained from these calculations.


Display Full Size version of this image (70K)

Fig. 1. (a) The hydrogen molecule interaction with the boron atom substituted in the UFF optimized CNT (4,4) cluster, where the terminal positions are saturated with hydrogen. (b) Hydrogen interaction with the boron atoms substituted in the adjacent positions of the carbon nanotube. (c) Hydrogen interaction with the alternate positions of the carbon nanotube (the arrow indicated are boron atom).

To study the reaction mechanism, a simple cluster model with 14 carbon atoms has been chosen. The cluster model is the terminal and reactive part in the SWNT for the hydrogen interaction and hydrogenation as shown in Fig. 2. The cluster was fully optimized with density functional B3LYP method with 6-31G (p,d) basis set. The nature of stationary points thus obtained was characterized by frequency calculations. All the transition states corresponding to hydrogen migration were located and characterized as saddle points using the frequency calculations. The geometric parameters and the nature of the imaginary frequencies were examined using the graphical interface program, Gauss View 03 [19]. All the DFT calculations were performed using Gaussian 03 in a cluster of IBM Linux machine.


Display Full Size version of this image (41K)

Fig. 2. The transition state energy profile of the boron substituted CNT cluster calculated by DFT method (B3LYP) with 6-31g (p, d) basis set.

3. Experimental section

3.1. Materials used

Tetrahydrofuran was dried over sodium and distilled before use. 1,4-Divinyl benzene and hydrofluoric acid, (all from Merck) were used as received. Acetylene (99.95%), hydrogen (99.98%) and argon (99.99%) were used with no further purification. Alumina template membranes (Click to view the MathML source pore diameter and Click to view the MathML source thick) were obtained commercially (Whatman Anodisc Membrane Filters, Whatman Inc.). H-zeolite-Y (Sud Chmie Pvt Ltd., India) and Na-montmorillonite used for the preparation of Al-pillared clay. AlCl3·6H2O (S.D. Fine-Chem Ltd., India) was used as source of aluminum ion for the preparation of Al-pillared clays. Helium (99.99%) and hydrogen (99.98%) were purified using a liquid nitrogen trap and activated carbon trap prior to hydrogen sorption experiments. Commercial activated carbons Calgon and CDX-975 were used to compare the hydrogen storage capacity with prepared CNTs.

3.2. Synthesis of pure and BCNTs

Pure carbon nanotubes (CNT1) were prepared by using polyphenylacetylene polymer as the carbon source by using alumina membrane as template. The polyphenyl acetylene/alumina composite was prepared by adding 10 ml of 5% w/w polyphenyl acetylene in dichloromethane to the alumina membrane applying vacuum from the bottom. The entire polymer solution penetrates inside the pores of the membrane by the mild suction applied. The solvent was evaporated slowly and the membrane was dried in vacuum at 373 K for 10 min. The composite was then polished with fine neutral alumina powder to remove the surface layers and ultrasonicated for 20 min to remove the residual alumina powder used for polishing. The composite was then carbonized by heating in argon atmosphere at 1173 K for 6 h at a heating rate of 10 K/min. This resulted in the deposition of carbon on the channel walls of the membrane. The carbon/alumina composite was then placed in 48% HF to free the nanotubes. The tubes were washed with distilled water to remove HF [20] and [21].

Boron containing carbon nanotubes (BCNT1) were prepared by using the boron containing polymer as the carbon precursor. Stable cross-linked π-conjugated hydroborane polymer prepared by hydroboration polymerization of 1,4-divinylbenzene and diborane in THF medium. In situ polymerization has been carried out over the alumina membrane template in THF medium under nitrogen atmosphere. After the polymerization, the membranes were removed and polished with alumina powder to remove the adhered polymers. The polymer/alumina composite membranes have been carbonized at Click to view the MathML source for 6 h in argon atmosphere. The carbon/alumina composite was treated with 48% HF for 24 h to remove the template and washed with distilled water followed by drying at Click to view the MathML source (BCNT1).

Other pure and BCNTs were prepared by chemical vapour deposition (CVD) method by using H-zeolite Y (CNT2 and BCNT2) and Al-pillared clay (CNT3 and BCNT3) as template. Al-pillaring of clay has been carried out using aluminium polycationic species Click to view the MathML source [22] and [23]. The polycations are prepared by the partial base hydrolysis of a dilute solution of aluminum chloride. Acetylene (5 ml/min) has been used as a carbon source and for boron source in situ generation of borane gas by the addition of concentrated H2SO4 to the NaBH4 in THF medium, carbonized at Click to view the MathML source in argon atmosphere. The carbon/zeolite and carbon/clay composite have been treated with 48% HF for 24 h and the undissolved carbon was washed with distilled water and dried at Click to view the MathML source. Various routes have been evolved for the synthesis of boron doped nanotubes, including arc discharge, laser ablation, substitution reactions and pyrolysis of precursors like acetylene–diborane mixtures in a flow of helium and hydrogen [24], [25] and [26]. In the arc discharge and laser ablation techniques to produce CNTs, difficulties are encountered in the control of size and alignment of the nanotubes. Further, these techniques require purification processes to separate the CNTs from the catalyst particles used in the synthesis. In the present case metal or metal oxide catalyst were not used and this will avoid the presence of metal impurities in CNTs and facilitates the study of the effect of heteroatom alone.

3.3. Materials characterization

The BCNTs prepared were characterized by powder X-ray diffraction using Shimadzu XD-D1 X-ray diffractometer with Ni-filtered Cu Kα radiation Click to view the MathML source. FT-IR Shimadzu 8400 series was used for IR studies in the range of 400–Click to view the MathML source. Transmission electron micrographs (TEM) were recorded with a JEOL-JEM 100SX microscope, working at a 100 kV accelerating voltage. TEM sampling grids were prepared by placing Click to view the MathML source of the sample dispersed in ethanol solution on a carbon-coated grid and the solution was evaporated at room temperature. Scanning electron microscopic (SEM) images were obtained using Philips XL 30 instrument. Carbon and boron nuclear magnetic resonance (13C- and 11B-NMR) have been utilized to investigate the chemical environment of the CNTs. All MAS 13C- and 11B-NMR have been recorded using BRUKER probe head with a zirconium rotor of 4 mm diameter in Bruker AVANCE 400 MHz instrument. Boric acid has been chosen as reference at 0 ppm for 11B NMR. The entire spectrum was recorded at a spinning speed of 12 kHz.

3.4. Hydrogen absorption measurement

Volumetric low pressure and high pressure hydrogen adsorption measurements have been carried out using custom built volumetric and Seivert's apparatus. The high pressure adsorption apparatus consists of reservoir cell and a cylindrical sample cell of known volume (33.8 cm3). All possible care for the possible sources of leak was carefully taken and long blank run tests were carried out. Care has been taken to avoid the errors due to factors such as temperature instability, leaks and additional pressure and temperature effects caused by expanding the hydrogen from the reservoir to the sample cell. The volume of the system was determined by measuring accurately those of the single components at lower pressures using helium gas. The measurements were carried out by utilizing the systematic procedure as follows: Typically the mass of the carbon samples used for hydrogen storage measurements is in the region of 100–300 mg. Prior to measurement, the samples are degassed and heated at Click to view the MathML source for approximately 6 h in vacuum of Click to view the MathML source. The whole system has been pressurized at the desired value by hydrogen and change in pressure was monitored. The change in the pressure was recorded by a pressure transducer, after the equilibrium was reached. All the hydrogen adsorption measurements have been carried out at room temperature. The experiments have been repeated under the same conditions for various pressures. The hydrogen compressibility factors were utilized for the calculations.

4. Results and discussion

4.1. Theoretical study

The quantum chemical calculation has been carried on the cluster model as shown in Fig. 1 to find the hydrogen interaction in pure and boron substituted CNT. From the results, it appears that substitution of carbon by boron atom appears to favour the activation and dissociation of hydrogen molecule. The total energy, H–H bond distance and the dissociation energy of hydrogen molecule obtained from the DFT calculation are given in Table 1. The essential out come from the calculations are the dissociation energy of hydrogen in its free state is 4.76 eV, and remains unaltered when it is placed in between the pure CNTs (4.51 eV). The substitution of boron atom in the CNT shows interesting results, such as single boron substitution in CNT cannot activate the hydrogen molecule, whereas two boron atoms are essential for the hydrogen activation. The dissociation energy of hydrogen for single boron substitution is 5.95 eV whereas when two boron atoms are substituted in adjacent positions the dissociation energy is reduced to 3.88 eV. It is further decreased to 0.28 eV when two boron atoms are substituted in the alternate positions. Though the calculated dissociation energy values are unrealistically small, they definitely indicate that the dissociation of hydrogen molecule is a facile process on heteroatom substituted CNTs. Even though the calculated dissociation energy is small, the process of hydrogen storage may involve other barriers including mass transport and hence could not be achieved at such low energies. From the calculation, it is observed that the substitution of boron at alternate positions is favourable for hydrogen activation rather than substitution at adjacent positions. It can be substantiated that boron–boron bond length is a key factor for H–H bond activation. An alternate position of B substitution seems to be favourable for the activation of hydrogen, wherein bonding appears to be similar to that of diborane [27] and [28].

Table 1.

The bond length and dissociation energy of hydrogen on the CNTs calculated using B3LYP with 6-31g (p,d) basis set on the UFF optimized structure
Substitution Total energy (Hartrees) Bond length H1Click to view the MathML source Dissociation energy (eV)
H2 −1.175 0.708 4.76
CNT −3686.5502
CNT+H2 −3687.7161 0.776 4.51
BCNT −3671.7254
BCNT+H2 −3672.9440 0.818 5.95
2BCNT (adjacent) −3658.6666
2BCNT (adjacent)+H2 −3659.8092 0.913 3.88
2BCNT (alternate) −3659.3491
2BCNT (alternate)+H2 −3660.3594 0.928 0.28

Essentially the hydrogen activation and subsequent hydrogenation of carbon atoms of BCNTs are conceived by the pathway shown in Fig. 2. In this alternate substitution configuration, the overall activation barrier is considerably reduced to nearly 1.5 eV, whereas for the situation of substitution at adjacent positions the activation barrier is of the order of 2.22 eV. This is an indication that the substitution at alternate position is geometrically more favourable than adjacent substitution for hydrogenation of carbon atoms of CNT, while the C–H formation is not that favourable for the system where boron substitution is effected at adjacent position. The results substantiating these statements are given in Table 2.

Table 2.

The transition state optimized parameters of the cluster and the value of the activation energy calculated by B3LYP with 6-31G (p,d) basis set
Substitution Ea I (eV) Ea II (eV) H1Click to view the MathML source X–H (Å) C–H1b Click to view the MathML source C–H2b Click to view the MathML source
Two boron substituted CNT cluster (adjacent) 2.22 2.98 1.95 1.31 2.59 2.72
Two boron substituted CNT cluster (alternate) 1.5 2.33 2.95 1.47 1.47 2.34
a Click to view the MathML source.
b Shortest C–H bond distance.

4.2. Experimental study

4.2.1. Characterization of pure and BCNTs prepared by template assisted synthesis

4.2.1.1. CNTs prepared from alumina membrane as the template.

X-ray diffraction study has been carried out on the CNTs produced by alumina membrane as template and the diffractograms are shown in Fig. 3a. The CNTs produced were graphitic in nature and the diffraction at 2θ=26ring operator corresponds to (0 0 2) plane of hexagonal graphite (JCPDS car files, no. 41-1487). The graphitic natures of CNTs are mainly due to the carbonization of the carbon precursors at Click to view the MathML source. There exist a shift in the d value for (0 0 2) plane, which is attributed to the substitution of boron in the carbon network. The intensities of in-plane reflections particularly for the 110 reflection at 2θ=32ring operator are weaker in the case of BCNT1; this may be due to the presence of localized BC3 domains slightly influencing the periodic atomic arrangement of the hexagonal carbon network [29].


Display Full Size version of this image (10K)

Fig. 3. X-ray diffraction pattern (a) and Raman spectra (b) of pure and boron containing carbon nanotubes (CNT1 and BCNT1).

Raman spectra (Fig. 3b) show the D-peak Click to view the MathML source due to the disorder-induced phonon mode (breathing mode, A1g-band) and the G-peak Click to view the MathML source assigned to the Raman-allowed phonon mode (E2g-band). The CNTs synthesized showed the same grade of disorderness in the graphitic structure. The CNTs produced by the polymer precursor using alumina membrane as template show the same intensity of D and G band character. This is due to the more graphitic nature with higher degree of disorderliness. The disorder is created by the tubular morphology and the substitutional effect of boron in the CNTs. There also exists a shift in the Raman D-band due to the substitutional effect of boron in the carbon lattice.

From the SEM (Fig. 4a and c) the morphology of tubular and well-aligned bundles of pure and boron containing carbon nanotubes (CNT and BCNT1) samples are well seen.


Display Full Size version of this image (64K)

Fig. 4. (a and b) SEM and TEM images of the pure carbon nanotubes (CNT1), respectively, (c and d). SEM and TEM images of the boron substituted carbon nanotubes (BCNT1), respectively.

The HR-TEM (Fig. 4b and d) of CNT1 and BCNT1 after the carbonization at Click to view the MathML source for 6 h shows hollow tubes with slight deformation in the end of the tube, probably caused by the ultrasonication and vigorous HF treatment. Micrograph also indicates the formation of cylindrical, hollow and transparent tubes. The outer diameter of the tube is less than the (approximately 150 nm) channel diameter of the template used (also a layer of amorphous carbon on the wall of the tube is seen). Though the carbon tubes produced by this method are not completely graphitic in nature, as those produced by arc-discharge process, their disordered structure is quite typical of fibres or nanotubes produced by decomposition of hydrocarbons, as is evident from the amorphous carbon on the wall of the CNT.

4.2.1.2. CNTs prepared from zeolite as template.

The XRD pattern of CNTs prepared from zeolite as template is shown in Fig. 5a. The predominant (2 0 0) plane at 2θ=24.1ring operator of graphitic peak is observed for both CNT2 and BCNT2. However, BCNT2 showed a predominant peak at 2θ=32ring operator corresponds to (1 1 1) diffraction of boron carbide (boron carbide, JCPDS files, no. 86-1128). This recommends the presence of boron in carbon.


Display Full Size version of this image (10K)

Fig. 5. (a and b) X-ray diffraction pattern and Raman spectra of pure and boron containing carbon nanotubes (CNT2 and BCNT2), respectively.

Raman studies (Fig. 5b) showed the graphitic D-band and G-band for the prepared CNTs using zeolite as template. The FWHM and the intensity of the D-band are higher than the G-band in BCNT2 compared to CNT2, which signify the greater disorderliness due to boron substitution in the CNTs. The D-band increases with increase in the disorder which is normally represented by the ID/IG ratio. Usually the ID/IG ratio increases with (i) increasing the amount of amorphous carbon in the material and (ii) decreasing the graphite crystal size. From the studies it is found that ID/IG ratio increased. This indicates the substitution of boron in the carbon frame work and decrease of the graphitization process.

The SEM images of CNT2 and BCNT2 showed amorphous and fibrous nature of the CNTs produced. Usually CNTs produced by CVD method leads to the formation of nanotubes with disordered structure, amorphous carbon and fibres [30] and [31], which can be seen from the TEM images (Fig. 6b and d).


Display Full Size version of this image (76K)

Fig. 6. SEM and TEM images of the carbon nanotubes: (a and c). SEM images of CNT2 and BCNT2 (b and d) TEM images of carbon nanotubes CNT2 and BCNT2 prepared from zeolite as template, respectively.

4.2.1.3. CNTs prepared from clay as template.

The XRD pattern and Raman spectrum of CNT3 and BCNT3 are shown in Fig. 7. Graphitic nature of the CNTs produced is seen in Fig. 7a. Predominant (0 0 2) plane of graphite at 2θ=23.8ring operator and (0 0 1) plane at 2θ equal to 45.1ring operator are viewed. BCNT3 showed a broad peak at 2θ=32ring operator corresponds to (1 1 1) diffraction of boron carbide, indicates the presence of boron in carbon lattice. From the Raman analysis, well-resolved D-bands and G-bands are shown for both the CNTs, where BCNT3 showed broad peaks with high FWHM compared to pure CNT3. This can be attributed to the increased disorderliness by boron substitution in the CNTs. The shift in the d-values is not significant by the substitution of heteroatom into the carbon lattice. However, Raman spectrum showed well-resolved D-band characteristic peak for destabilization.


Display Full Size version of this image (9K)

Fig. 7. (a and b) X-ray diffraction pattern and Raman spectra of pure and boron containing carbon nanotubes (CNT3 and BCNT3), respectively.

SEM and TEM images of CNTs prepared from clay as template are shown in Fig. 8. SEM images showed layered type structure with amorphous nature. Peculiarly BCNT3 showed layered structure with special open arrangement. TEM images showed layered and disordered structure with amorphous and fibrous carbon. Since no catalyst has been used for the synthesis of CNTs, it is worth pointing out that the nanotubes produced by template synthesis under normal experimental conditions are almost free from impurities.


Display Full Size version of this image (68K)

Fig. 8. (a and b) SEM and TEM pictures of pure carbon nanotube (CNT3) prepared from clay as template. (c and d) SEM and TEM images of boron containing carbon nanotubes (BCNT3), respectively.

4.2.1.4. IR spectra of BCNTs.

The boron substitution in the carbon network displayed an effective downshift of the vibrations, which is attributed to the much lower force constant by B–C than that of C–C force constant. The presence of band at Click to view the MathML source corresponds to C–B bond in all the samples (Fig. 9). Usually C–B band occurs at 1050–Click to view the MathML source increase in the frequency is correlated to higher carbon contents [32]. This shows that the prepared CNTs are having higher carbon contents by the synthetic strategy applied. The formation of band at Click to view the MathML source in the BCNTs (2 and 3) sample mainly corresponds to the B–B entity in the carbon network.


Display Full Size version of this image (8K)

Fig. 9. FT-IR spectrum of the boron containing carbon nanotubes (BCNTs).

4.2.1.5. Solid state 13C & 11B MAS NMR of BCNTs.

The chemical environment of the CNTs has been characterized by NMR experiments. In the 13C CP MAS NMR experiment graphitic nature of the CNTs are well evident from the spectrum by the characteristic peak at 129 ppm (Fig. 10a) for the BCNT1. The 11B MAS NMR experiment shows the environment of boron in carbon network. In 11B MAS NMR the dipolar interaction is only possible by the homonuclear B–B interaction, whereas in MAS condition the heteroatom 13C shows very low nuclear spin and the interaction is negligible. Though the possibility of second-order quadrupole interaction is due to 11B (I=3/2), the MAS (magic angle spinning) does eliminate secondary quadrupole interaction and the line shape is due to main interaction only. Second-order quadrupole interaction does not contribute to the line shape [29]. In the experiments two different chemical environments are observed for the BCNT1 which is prepared by polymer precursor route (Fig. 10b). There is a clear indication that boron atoms are bonded to carbon atom in two different environments and there is no possible quadrupole interaction due to B–B bond and also the hetero nuclear interaction with 13C is very weak. BCNT2 shows a broad spectrum and has the possibility of multiple environment and presence of B–B entity. These results reveal that boron atoms are present in two different chemical environments for BCNT1 prepared by polymer route.


Display Full Size version of this image (22K)

Fig. 10. (a) 13C CP MAS NMR of BCNT1 and (b) 11B MAS NMR spectrum of boron containing carbon nanotubes prepared by different methods (BCNT1 and BCNT2).

4.2.2. Hydrogen absorption studies

Hydrogen absorption activity of CNTs have been carried out at various temperatures -196, 25, 100 and Click to view the MathML source at 0–760 mmHg pressure. The absorption at room temperature is negligible; however, absorption isotherm at 77 K shows that at this temperature the condensation of hydrogen is not possible and it requires either low temperature of 20 K or higher pressure. The values of specific surface area (SSA) evaluated by BET method using nitrogen gas absorption at Click to view the MathML source and the maximum hydrogen absorption at 760 mmHg of pressure for various temperatures are given in Table 3. From the results, it is seen that hydrogen absorption at Click to view the MathML source showed a maximum of 1.2 wt% for the boron containing carbon nanotubes (BCNT1) and high surface area Calgon activated carbon.

Table 3.

The hydrogen absorption activity of carbon materials at different temperatures at 1 atm pressure and specific surface area measured by BET method
Samples SSA (m2/g) Volume of hydrogen absorbed at 1 atm (cm3/g) at various temperatures (ring operatorC)
−196 25 100 150
BCNT1 523 127 16.5
CNT2 633 28.0 3.42
BCNT2 62.3 3.22 2.38 4.73
CNT3 48.8 3.0
BCNT3 32.7 1.09 1.7
CDX-975 325 28.1 0.53 2.83 4.18
Calgon 931 138 0.70 0.43

High pressure hydrogen adsorption measurements (Fig. 11) show that the hydrogen storage capacity increases with pressure. A maximum storage capacity of 2 wt% at 80 bar pressure is obtained for BCNT1, whereas pure carbon nanotubes (CNT1) shows 0.6 wt%. Samples CNT2, BCNT2, CNT3 and BCNT3 show a maximum of 0.2 wt% at this pressure. The commercial samples also store hydrogen in the same order of magnitude with a maximum of 0.3 wt% for CX-975. These results show that there should be some activators needed to activate the hydrogen and boron substitution in carbon act as activators. These boron atoms should be incorporated suitably with appropriate geometrical and chemical environment for hydrogen activation. The results contented well with the theoretical predictions.


Display Full Size version of this image (9K)

Fig. 11. High pressure hydrogen adsorption activity of various carbon materials.

5. Summary

Theoretical studies have shown that the effective hydrogenation of CNTs is possible with activation centres and the BCNTs are able to activate the hydrogen in a facile manner compared to pure CNTs. For effective hydrogenation and hydrogen storage these boron atoms should be incorporated geometrically and chemically into the carbon network. BCNTs have been produced successfully by template assisted synthesis method. An effective and reproducible method of producing BCNTs with uniform pore diameter has been demonstrated by using alumina membrane as template. Use of different template and carbon sources results in variation of chemical environment of boron, which is identified by 11B CP MAS NMR. BCNTs produced by using hydroborane polymer as the carbon precursor in alumina membrane template showed high hydrogen absorption activity. These materials show different chemical environments for boron with maximum Click to view the MathML source of hydrogen storage capacity at 80 bar and room temperature. This configuration has a bearing in hydrogen sorption characteristics.


Acknowledgements

We thank Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, for the fellowship to one of us (M.S.) and MNRE Government of India, for financial support.


References

[1] A.C. Dillon, K.M. Jones, T.A. Bekkedahl, C.H. Kiang, D.S. Bethune and M.J. Heben, Storage of hydrogen in single-walled carbon nanotubes, Nature 386 (1997), pp. 377–379. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1454)

[2] S. Hynek, W. Fuller and J. Bentley, Hydrogen storage by carbon sorption, Int J Hydrogen Energy 22 (1997), pp. 601–610. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (692 K)

[3] A. Chambers, C. Parks, R.T.K. Baker and N.M. Rodriguez, Hydrogen storage in graphite nanofibers, J Phys Chem B 102 (1998), pp. 4253–4256. Full Text via CrossRef

[4] C. Liu, Y.Y. Fan, M. Liu, H.T. Cong, H.M. Cheng and M.S. Dresselhaus, Hydrogen storage in single walled carbon nanotubes at room temperature, Science 286 (1999), pp. 1127–1129. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (734)

[5] H.G. Schimmel, G.J. Kearley, M.G. Nijkamp, C.T. Visser, K.P. de Jong and F.M. Mulder, Hydrogen adsorption in carbon nanostructures: comparison of nanotubes, fibres, and coals, Chem Eur J 9 (2003), pp. 4764–4770. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (52)

[6] Y. Ren and D.L. Price, Neutron scattering study of H2 adsorption in single-walled carbon nanotubes, Appl Phys Lett 79 (2001), pp. 3684–3686. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (33)

[7] P. Chen, X. Wu, J. Lin and K.L. Tan, High H2 uptake by alkali-doped carbon nanotubes under ambient pressure and moderate temperatures, Science 285 (1999), pp. 91–93. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (490)

[8] F.E. Pinkerton, B.G. Wicke, C.H. Olk, G.G. Tibbetts, G.P. Meisner and M.S. Meyer et al., Thermogravimetric measurement of hydrogen absorption in alkali-modified carbon materials, J Phys Chem B 104 (2000), pp. 9460–9467. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (80)

[9] R.T. Yang, Hydrogen storage by alkali-doped carbon nanotubes—revisited, Carbon 38 (2000), pp. 623–626. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (97 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (217)

[10] M. Hirscher, M. Becher, M. Haluska, A. Quintel, V. Skakalova and Y.M. Choi et al., Hydrogen storage in carbon nanostructures, J Alloys Compds 330 (2002), pp. 654–658. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (109 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (106)

[11] A. Lueking and RT. Yang, Hydrogen spillover from a metal oxide catalyst onto carbon nanotubes-implications for hydrogen storage, J Catal 206 (2002), pp. 165–168. Abstract | Abstract + References | PDF (144 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (40)

[12] M. Sankaran and B. Viswanathan, Hydriding of nitrogen containing carbon nanotubes, Bull Catal Soc India 2 (2003), pp. 9–11.

[13] Z.H. Zhu, H. Hatori, S.B. Wang and G.Q. Lu, Insights into hydrogen atom adsorption on and the electrochemical properties of nitrogen substituted carbon materials, J Phys Chem B 109 (2005), pp. 16744–16749. View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)

[14] M. Sankaran and B. Viswanathan, The role of heteroatoms in carbon nanotubes for hydrogen storage, Carbon 44 (2006), pp. 2816–2821. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (221 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)

[15] A.K. Rappe, C.J. Casewit, K.S. Colwell, W.A. Goddard and W.M. Skiff, UFF, a full periodic table force field for molecular mechanics and molecular dynamics simulations, J Am Chem Soc 144 (1992), pp. 10024–10035. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (1321)

[16] A.D. Becke, Density-functional thermochemistry. III. The role of exact exchange, J Chem Phys 98 (1993), pp. 5648–5652. Full Text via CrossRef

[17] C. Lee, W. Yang and R.G. Parr, Development of the Colle–Salvetti correlation-energy formula into a functional of the electron density, Phys Rev B 37 (1988), pp. 785–789. Full Text via CrossRef

[18] Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR. et al. Gaussian 03. Revision C.02. Gaussian Inc., Wallingford CT: 2004.

[19] Dennington II R, Keith T, Millam J, Eppinnett K, Hovell WL, Gillil R. GaussView, Version 3.09, Semichem, Inc., K.S. Shawnee Mission; 2003.

[20] B. Rajesh, K.R. Thampi, J.M. Bonard, N. Xanthopoulos and H.J. Mathieu et al., Carbon nanotubes generated from template carbonization of polyphenyl acetylene as the support for electrooxidation of methanol, J Phys Chem B 107 (2003), pp. 2701–2708. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (56)

[21] B. Rajesh, S. Karthikeyan, J.M. Bonard, K.R. Thampi and B. Viswanathan, Carbon nanotubes generated from polyphenyl acetylene, Eurasian Chem Tech J 3 (2001), pp. 11–16.

[22] A. Vaccari, Preparation and catalytic properties of cationic and anionic clays, Catal Today 41 (1998), pp. 53–71. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (473 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (209)

[23] F. Figueras, Pillared clays as catalysts, Catal Rev Sci Eng 30 (1988), pp. 457–499. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (259)

[24] E. Borowiak-Palen, T. Pichler, G.G. Fuentes, A. Graff, R.J. Kalenczuk and M. Knupfer et al., Efficient production of B-substituted single-wall carbon nanotubes, Chem Phys Lett 378 (2003), pp. 516–520. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (211 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (22)

[25] W. Han, Y. Bando, K. Kurashima and T. Satom, Boron-doped carbon nanotubes prepared through a substitution reaction, Chem Phys Lett 299 (1999), pp. 368–373. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (852 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (67)

[26] D. Golberg, Y. Bando, W. Han, K. Kurashima and T. Sato, Single-walled B-doped carbon, B/N-doped carbon and BN nanotubes synthesized from single-walled carbon nanotubes through a substitution reaction, Chem Phys Lett 308 (1999), pp. 337–342. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (488 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (111)

[27] M. Sankaran, K. Muthukumar and B. Viswanathan, Boron substituted fullerene—can they be one of the options for hydrogen storage?, Fullarene Nanotubes Carbon Nanostr 13 (2005), pp. 43–52. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (2)

[28] R.C. Weast, Handbook of chemistry and physics (59th ed.), CRC Press, Boca Raton (1978) p. F217.

[29] T. Shirasaki, A. Derré, M. Ménétrier, A. Tressaud and S. Flandrois, Synthesis and characterization of boron-substituted carbons, Carbon 38 (2000), pp. 1461–1467. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (349 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (26)

[30] J.F. Colomer, G. Bister, I. Willems, Z. Konya, A. Fonseca and G. Van Tendeloo et al., Synthesis of single-walled carbon nanotubes by catalytic decomposition of hydrocarbons, Chem Commun 10 (1999), pp. 1343–1344. Full Text via CrossRef | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (66)

[31] L. Ci, S. Xie, D. Tang, X. Yan, Y. Li and Z. Liu et al., Controllable growth of single wall carbon nanotubes by pyrolizing acetylene on the floating iron catalysts, Chem Phys Lett 349 (2001), pp. 191–195. SummaryPlus | Full Text + Links | PDF (191 K) | View Record in Scopus | Cited By in Scopus (38)

[32] K. Shirai, S. Emura, S. Gonda and Y.Y. Kumashiro, Infrared study of amorphous B1xCx films, J Appl Phys 78 (1995), pp. 3392–3400. Full Text via CrossRef



Corresponding Author Contact InformationCorresponding author.


Note to users: The section "Articles in Press" contains peer reviewed accepted articles to be published in this journal. When the final article is assigned to an issue of the journal, the "Article in Press" version will be removed from this section and will appear in the associated published journal issue. The date it was first made available online will be carried over. Please be aware that although "Articles in Press" do not have all bibliographic details available yet, they can already be cited using the year of online publication and the DOI as follows: Author(s), Article Title, Journal (Year), DOI. Please consult the journal's reference style for the exact appearance of these elements, abbreviation of journal names and the use of punctuation.
There are three types of "Articles in Press":
  • Accepted manuscripts: these are articles that have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication by the Editorial Board. The articles have not yet been copy edited and/or formatted in the journal house style.
  • Uncorrected proofs: these are copy edited and formatted articles that are not yet finalized and that will be corrected by the authors. Therefore the text could change before final publication.
  • Corrected proofs: these are articles containing the authors' corrections and may, or may not yet have specific issue and page numbers assigned.
International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
Article in Press, Corrected Proof
Result list |  previous  < 1 of 169 >  next 
 
Home
Browse
Search
My Settings
Alerts
Help
Elsevier.com (Opens new window)
About ScienceDirect  |  Contact Us  |  Terms & Conditions  |  Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. ScienceDirect® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V.